I finally had access to the ruling of the trial I had with Mr. Bejarano, some were already getting impatient. And as I promised to mention to the issue happened after studying it in detail with my lawyer.
Indeed, I am sentenced to pay a fine. However, careful reading of the text of the sentence extract some conclusions and thoughts I share with you:
1) I still think this is a show that perpetrated this gentleman with the help of others and did not so innocent, or free at all. He had a purpose, seeking to mount a prosecution against me which I impute the commission of a crime then you assumed my disqualification. You will remember the issue of "bear" and veiled accusations that released this man, the meetings with the PP at home ,.... In this way they could get something not achieved in the democratic polls.
First cake in the face designed plan. Your complaint and the subsequent procedure was classified as errors and not as a crime as intended by this gentleman, which could no longer achieve the larger goal, since a trial of offenses is a minor procedure that in no case can be sentenced to imprisonment or disqualification, monetary fines only. Therefore, the first clear conclusion, I have not committed any crime.
2) Mr. Bejarano claimed that this was a threat and harassment, that was the subject of your complaint initial. That it would be nice to their history and their future career is what you are thinking for some time, that is like to live the theme that has been mounted.
not get those purposes since the conviction is for a lack of injuries is very different from the threats as he wanted.
3) tried to sneak into the trial, the request for compensation for alleged moral damages (that too was interested in were threats and harassment) 1500 euros worth of masking with an alleged target of a social nature to try to prove what is not.
After giving some back to the subject, I have given appropriate instructions to my lawyers not to appeal the sentence. I do not agree with it, that's true, because I think that the trial could not bring to light this whole plot. Neither could we show that this man was not telling the truth in a part of his speech, saying it was low médica por esos hechos, cuando en realidad él estaba de baja médica desde junio y los hechos ocurrieron en agosto. No se nos permitió aportar los partes de baja que demostraban tal extremo.
The judge clearly said in the statement of claim for damages is not. Judge tells quote ... "the complainant must provide proof and evidence as they justify the reality of your request. So in this case has no means to prove the reality of the moral damage caused, not the medical record that reveals any physical or mental injury suffered by the complainant ... or the severity. "
4) Finally, I sentence only by a lack of libel to pay a financial penalty to the court, not Mr. Bejarano.
After giving some back to the subject, I have given appropriate instructions to my lawyers not to appeal the sentence. I do not agree with it, that's true, because I think that the trial could not bring to light this whole plot. Neither could we show that this man was not telling the truth in a part of his speech, saying it was low médica por esos hechos, cuando en realidad él estaba de baja médica desde junio y los hechos ocurrieron en agosto. No se nos permitió aportar los partes de baja que demostraban tal extremo.
No obstante, debo pagar una multa al Juzgado por llamar a este señor “mala persona”. No es que en estos momentos quiera tirar cohetes de alegría, la verdad, pero creo que dije lo que pensaba de este señor y toda la gente lo sabe. Voy a pagar de mi bolsillo la multa sin ningún tipo de problemas.
Así que no voy a recurrir, I do not want to spend more time with this man, does not deserve any longer, I will not further lengthen the proceedings so unnecessary and useless.
0 comments:
Post a Comment